Plagiarism is the exact statement made by another individual that has been copied and dubbed as an original by another person. The links in Noah’s argument serve to demonstrate that the research behind the aspects of plagiarism have been thoroughly dissected and reviewed. This also helps apply that everyone has a different understanding of what plagiarism actually is. The affect my understanding of the issues at hand by providing specific sources at hand to further develop my own opinion on plagiarism. The one I found to be most helpful was the previously noted (where it gives an opinion that she did plagiarize) and the least helpful to me was the link to Newshour with Jim Lehrer. I would definitely consider using links within when creating a web page in order to vary my sources.
Noah argues his claim very persuasively. His most persuasive arguments are, well, all of them. He includes several resources for each of his examples and each are equally represented. Overall his claims are believable because he has an abundance of sources. If he wasn’t so diverse with his sources I would be more skeptical of his claim but he leaves little room to argue.
Sunday, November 4, 2007
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)

1 comment:
yes, so the moral is, cite early and cite often
Post a Comment